Appt went well. He did *awesome* for the echo!! Will have cath in March or April to get more info on narrowing and possibly balloon it...There's only so much information you can post in a 140-character tweet, right? Right. So let me break this down for you:
- CHASE DID AWESOME FOR HIS ECHO! Yes, this of course is reason to be excited and think things went well. From the perspective of getting a mobile, determined little 15-month-old toddler to lay still for 20-30 minutes in order to complete the echo and get decent pictures, it was the best appointment ever! He watched a little Cat in the Hat and Curious George on my iPhone (that I happened to download that morning right before we left for his appointment... whew!) and laid so still the entire time. Hubs and I were beyond impressed and proud of our little warrior!!!
- Chase's pediatric cardiologist (PC) saw a narrowing of Chase's left pulmonary artery (LPA) during his last echo in November 2010. He thought Chase would need to head to MUSC in January for a heart cath to look into this problem, but after consulting with Chase's surgeon at MUSC, they decided they could delay Chase's heart cath until early spring.
- Something to keep in mind: Chase shouldn't have needed ANY cath procedures until his pre-Fontan cath, which, for all intents and purposes, should not be happening until Chase is 3 or 4 years old.
- At his appointment last Friday, Chase's PC again saw the narrowing of Chase's LPA, and concluded that we needed to get Chase on the cath schedule at MUSC in March or April. Again, if it weren't for this LPA narrowing, Chase would not be having a cath procedure for another 2 to 3 YEARS.
- Because of the location of the LPA narrowing (near the exact point where his inferior vena cava (IVC) will be connected to his LPA during his final scheduled surgery, the Fontan), it is highly unlikely that any intervention in the cath lab (i.e. ballooning the area) will be very helpful. They cannot place a stent to open this narrowing up, again, because it is where the surgeon will be connecting the IVC to the LPA during the Fontan. So essentially, there is NOTHING they can do about this narrowing, EXCEPT...
- Chase may have his Fontan as early as THIS SUMMER, when he will barely be 18 MONTHS OLD. The preferred age for the Fontan at MUSC is 3 or 4 YEARS OLD. Obviously anyone can see this is a HUGE discrepancy in age. Chase would be much younger, weigh much less than they'd like, have much smaller veins and arteries than they'd like, etc. During the Fontan, the surgeon will use an extracardiac conduit, essentially a graft/tube, and he doesn't want to have to go back in with another surgery later to change or resize it as Chase grows. All in all, they CAN do the Fontan this young but it is NOT preferred. By any means.
- Just to confirm, in case I've lost you, THIS IS NOT GOOD.
So sorry that my earlier tweet/text on Friday didn't seem to convey the outcome of Chase's appointment very well. It's difficult to keep people updated with the right information, especially if they don't read my blog. I like to put things out here so that I can avoid telling the same stories over and over and over again.
But I digress... I will tell you that I sent an email to a PC at MUSC who is very familiar with our case and asked him several questions concerning Chase's PC's assessment of needing the cath in March or April. When I spoke with the MUSC PC previously, he informed me that it is not at all uncommon to see a narrowing at the point in the LPA where the stent (from the Norwood) was removed (during the Glenn). Only thing is, they typically never see this on echo, but since Chase was able to get such good pictures during his Nov. echo and again last week, they were able to see the narrowing on echo. So if you think about it, it's quite possible that almost all HLHS patients in our area aren't sent down to MUSC for their pre-Fontan cath procedure until they are closer to 3 or 4 years old, and they never would've known about the narrowing because it's almost impossible to see it on echo. So hubs and I are very interested in the MUSC PC's opinion once he has a chance to review the Nov. and Feb. echos and determine if he thinks it's necessary to be concerned about the LPA narrowing, enough to put Chase through a potentially unnecessary cath procedure, which requires anesthesia, intubation, an overnight stay (at minimum), etc. If the MUSC PC feels it'd be in Chase's best interest to move forward with the cath if for no other reason than to take accurate measurements of the LPA narrowing and confirm there are no issues or problems with the decreased blood flow to the left lung, nor conversely, no issues or problems with the increased blood flow to the right lung, then so be it. We will do whatever is in our son's best interest. However, hubs and I have never been the kind of parents to take one person's opinion as the final answer and will continue to question every decision regarding our son's care. Obviously. We are his only advocates and we take our job VERY seriously.
Hopefully this helps you all understand where we're at and what our next steps will be. Please keep us in your thoughts and prayers as we work with Chase's medical team to determine what is truly in his best interest. Thank you!
On that note, I think I'll share a few pics of my little man from his appointment last Friday. You're welcome! :)
|Waiting to be called back for the echo. Notice his little one-socked feet... they had just finished his pulse ox (and blood pressures).|
|The end of the echo. He was absolutely amazing. This boy never ceases to amaze me!!!|
|Waiting to see the doc to discuss the echo results. Just look at those eyes. He sure does have a story to tell, doesn't he?|
I am so sorry to hear that you may be having to head to MUSC for another procedure. You are such a great heart Mom for being his advocate - making the phone calls, doing the research and requesting the second opinion on this. Praying that the Lord makes this decision abundantly clear to everyone involved.ReplyDelete
Mom to Anna Grace